<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jerrod Balzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jerrodbalzer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jerrodbalzer.com</link>
	<description>Associate Editor at KHP Publishers, Inc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Royalty vs. Gross Royalty by JerrodBalzer</title>
		<link>http://jerrodbalzer.com/net-royalty-vs-gross-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-3295</link>
		<dc:creator>JerrodBalzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerrodbalzer.com/?page_id=23#comment-3295</guid>
		<description>I was reiterating the beginning of the post, that someone had stated if a press pays a portion of Net, it&#039;s a big red flag when it&#039;s in fact, not.

Actually, with ebooks being the big sellers these days, it&#039;s the norm to pay a percentage of whatever the distributor (Amazon, Nook, etc) pays the publisher, which would be Net. And there are no overhead fees involved in this to creep into funds, or at least, there shouldn&#039;t be. If a press claims there are, THAT might call for a red flag, but again, not the method of payment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reiterating the beginning of the post, that someone had stated if a press pays a portion of Net, it&#8217;s a big red flag when it&#8217;s in fact, not.</p>
<p>Actually, with ebooks being the big sellers these days, it&#8217;s the norm to pay a percentage of whatever the distributor (Amazon, Nook, etc) pays the publisher, which would be Net. And there are no overhead fees involved in this to creep into funds, or at least, there shouldn&#8217;t be. If a press claims there are, THAT might call for a red flag, but again, not the method of payment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Net Royalty vs. Gross Royalty by Hugh</title>
		<link>http://jerrodbalzer.com/net-royalty-vs-gross-royalty/comment-page-1/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerrodbalzer.com/?page_id=23#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. at the end of your piece you said this method of payment is NOT a red flag?  Is it Net profit or gross profit, or is it both?  Maybe I&#039;m thick as a post but, you lost me here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. at the end of your piece you said this method of payment is NOT a red flag?  Is it Net profit or gross profit, or is it both?  Maybe I&#8217;m thick as a post but, you lost me here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conversion Disorder by Red!</title>
		<link>http://jerrodbalzer.com/conversion-disorder/comment-page-1/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>Red!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerrodbalzer.com/?page_id=1386#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think my heart could be broken by a man I wasn&#039;t in love with before, but that video had me in tears. I love you and am trying very hard not to pity you. God bless! I will be praying more earnestly for you.

Red.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think my heart could be broken by a man I wasn&#8217;t in love with before, but that video had me in tears. I love you and am trying very hard not to pity you. God bless! I will be praying more earnestly for you.</p>
<p>Red.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

